Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federico Gaio vs Elias Ymer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gaio vs Ymer analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Gaio vs Elias Ymer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gaio 2 - 0 Ymer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gaio has won 47.66% of points on their second serve, while Ymer has won 44.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gaio, in recent form, has won 50% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ymer has won 48.94%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.66% and 32.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gaio has saved 56.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ymer has saved 54.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gaio has won 39.13% of matches played (W/L 18/ 28), with Ymer winning 43.28% (W/L 29/ 38) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gaio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 327/ 252), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Ymer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 225/ 146), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Gaio has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 35.48% of matches (W/L 11/ 20), where as Ymer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 23/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gaio winning 2 times and Ymer being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Gaio winning 4 and Ymer winning 1. The last match between Gaio and Ymer was at the Aix En Provence Challenger, 11-09-2020, Second, Clay with Federico Gaio getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:49:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gaio and Ymer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gaio winning 1 times and Ymer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gaio winning 0, and Ymer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gaio has played against opponents with an average rank of 283.09 while Ymer has played against players with an average rank of 223.87.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gaio has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ymer has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gaio has converted 35.07% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ymer has converted 47.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
414
Rank
124
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
182
Rank
105
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
54% (519-435)
Career Total W/L
55% (384-317)
35% (7-13)
YTD W/L
33% (8-16)
$392,005
Career Prize Money
$919,255
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Federico Gaio | Elias Ymer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 29 | 23 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:49:43 | 0:49:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (45/81) | 64% (37/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 87% (39/45) | 68% (25/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (16/36) | 62% (13/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/5) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (20/58) | 32% (26/81) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Federico Gaio
Player
Elias Ymer
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
39 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 7-5 4-6 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Federico Gaio | Elias Ymer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 35% (7/13) | 33% (8/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 35% (17/31) | 38% (21/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (199/245) | 48% (247/271) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 13% (1/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 46% (6/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 76 | 88 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 80 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:15 | 1:48:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 237 | 233.04 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (840/1438) | 57% (969/1694) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (551/840) | 67% (650/969) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (285/598) | 45% (325/725) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (47/134) | 48% (69/145) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (540/1460) | 39% (642/1629) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (2/8) | 44% (7/9) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 32% (6/19) | 30% (7/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 25% (2/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 58% (12/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 42% (12/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 8% (12/1) |
Federico Gaio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Federico Gaio
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
50 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Andrea Picchione
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Simone Agostini
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlo Alberto Caniato
Player
Federico Gaio
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Federico Gaio
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
75)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
10
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Blaise Bicknell
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
7
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Elias Ymer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Elias Ymer
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Elias Ymer
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
70 of
119)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
55 of
119)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Denis Yevseyev
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Jan Choinski
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Lloyd Harris
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Ethan Quinn
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Elias Ymer
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Elias Ymer
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Elias Ymer
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
49%
(
47 of
96)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
37
Total Points Won
26
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Gaio Vs Ymer Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gaio are available here and Ymer photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
